From Strategists for System Navigators: How AI is Reshaping Contract Management Amid Government Instability

The Tectonic Drift Beneath Procurement Roles
Not all transformations are explosive. Some arrive quietly, coded in algorithmic logic and deployed behind sleek dashboards. Across the government and government-adjacent sectors, contract managers, procurement professionals and vendor operations teams are experiencing a slow but seismic shift. What was once a domain of negotiation strategy, regulatory acumen and institutional memory is now being parsed into decision trees, automated risk scoring and clause libraries managed by AI.
This isn't just digital transformation—this is professional realignment.
And it’s happening at the exact moment when public sector professionals are facing historic uncertainty. The latest rounds of budget rescissions, stalled appropriations and politically motivated funding freezes have placed public procurement teams under tremendous pressure to do more with less—while maintaining compliance in an increasingly litigious and performance-based contracting environment.
What’s emerging is a paradox: highly credentialed professionals, many with advanced degrees and decades of experience, are being rerouted into system oversight roles—watchdogs of automation rather than architects of value.
The Promise (and Price) of Intelligent Procurement
The adoption of AI and digital procurement systems has not been unwarranted. Tools like , and AI-infused sourcing platforms offer undeniable benefits: cycle time reductions, real-time spend analytics, predictive supplier risk models and automated compliance monitoring. In an era when federal, state and municipal agencies are asked to justify every dollar, these efficiencies are not optional—they’re essential.
Agencies are moving quickly. According to , 74% of government procurement leaders now say they are either implementing or scaling AI capabilities across their sourcing and contracting functions. Gartner has also predicted that by , over 60% of government procurement tasks that today require manual intervention will be fully automated.
Defense, in particular, has embraced this frontier. Through , the Department of Defense is leveraging artificial intelligence to analyze drone surveillance footage in real time—drastically reducing the labor required for data interpretation and shifting the decision-making window from hours to seconds. While not a procurement function per se, it exemplifies how federal systems are prioritizing AI to streamline operations in mission-critical areas. The implications for acquisition are clear: smarter systems mean fewer hands-on roles and more oversight positions.
But what these statistics and success stories don’t show is the slow erosion of human judgment from decision-making loops.
In a typical workflow, AI selects a preferred supplier based on past performance and pricing, generates a contract using preloaded templates, and auto-fills risk parameters from standardized models. The contract manager’s role? Review. Approve. Move on.
Where, then, is the strategic insight that once defined these roles?
The Displacement Isn’t Loud—It’s Layered
Professionals in contract and procurement roles often describe their days now as “more reactive” and “less creative.”
This shift doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It’s layered atop fiscal anxiety. At the federal level, continuing resolution cycles, political brinkmanship and mid-year budget claw backs are stalling multi-year contracts and defunding discretionary programs with little notice. At the state level, pandemic-era surpluses have flipped into structural deficits. In this environment, procurement offices are under immense scrutiny—every contract must demonstrate ROI, withstand audit trails and deliver political optics.
It is not a stretch to say that the emerging role of the contract manager is now more risk-focused and tool-centered than ever before. As agencies shift their emphasis from pre-award mechanics to post-award outcomes, professionals are expected to deliver long-term value across the entire lifecycle—not just executing contracts but sustaining them.
The Hidden Risk: Deskilling by Design
As AI takes over more of the contract lifecycle—from pre-award analytics to post-award performance tracking—the risk isn’t just job displacement. It’s role erosion. Deskilling by design.
Without deliberate upskilling and redefinition of professional scope, the workforce behind these systems becomes less fluent in the strategy the tools are meant to enhance. The next generation of contract professionals may become highly competent system users but underexposed to the nuanced decision-making required for complex, multimillion-dollar deals or multi-agency cooperative contracts.
The Internal Revenue Service, for instance, has deployed an AI-driven to scan and evaluate contract language against federal compliance standards. While it expedites the review process and reduces error, it also narrows the role of the reviewer to a final checkpoint—less interpreter, more verifier. It’s an efficiency gain, yes—but at what long-term cost to institutional judgment?
This is particularly dangerous in government-adjacent sectors such as defense, energy and infrastructure—industries where a misinterpreted clause or missed compliance trigger can have multi-year consequences. Experienced professionals are critical not only for execution but also for ethical, equitable and value-driven procurement.
What Should Procurement Leaders Do Now?
Smart leaders recognize that transformation cannot be left to software vendors. Organizations must take intentional steps to ensure AI-driven procurement enhances—not hollows out—the human expertise that built the system in the first place.
Here are four leadership-level responses to consider:
1. Redefine the Strategic Value of Your Procurement TeamsĚý
Move beyond viewing your team as cost controllers. Emphasize their roles in risk mitigation, cross-agency collaboration and fostering long-term supplier relationships. AI can accelerate decisions—but it cannot replace institutional context.
2. Formalize Digital Literacy as Core CompetencyĚý
Require formal training—not just tool onboarding—around AI ethics, data bias, system dependencies and algorithmic decision-making. Understanding how these systems operate is now as critical as understanding FAR or .Ěý
The General Services Administration has taken a leadership role in this area, implementing a that uses machine learning to assess procurement solicitations for compliance. Tools like this signal the growing expectation that contract professionals understand not just what is being automated, but how and why.
3. Reinvest in Human-Centered Contract ReviewĚý
Build checkpoints where human analysis is required. Not optional. Not bypassed. Ensure that experienced staff are empowered to challenge system defaults and flag exceptions before finalizing approval chains.
4. Protect—and Plan for—the Next GenerationĚý
Younger professionals entering the field must be exposed to more than just dashboards and KPIs. Create rotational assignments that blend automation oversight with vendor negotiation, stakeholder consultation and post-award contract governance.
Beyond the Interface Lies the Future
In times of budget volatility and political headwinds, it’s tempting to let automation shoulder the burden. But contract management is not just a process—it’s a practice. And like any good practice, it needs both tools and tacticians.
If left unchecked, we risk replacing skilled strategists with compliance chaperones. But if navigated wisely, this transition can elevate the profession—making space for deeper insights, faster decisions and better outcomes.
The choice is not whether AI will change the role. It already has.
The question is: who will lead that change, and who will be led by it?
Advance Your Contract Management Career at şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř
If you’re a procurement, contract or vendor operations professional navigating this transformation, now is the time to align your experience with the future of the field.
şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř’s College of Professional Studies offers a Contract Management Certificate—designed to help seasoned professionals evolve, lead and future-proof their careers in contract management.
Taught by industry-leading practitioners, şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř’s professional education programs are thoughtfully designed for working professionals and built for utmost flexibility.
Learn how şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř can help take your contract management career to the next level.Ěý
About şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř’s College of Professional Studies: Founded in 2014, the College of Professional Studies (CPS) provides academically rigorous yet flexible educational pathways to high-achieving adult learners who are balancing professional and educational aspirations with life’s commitments. The CPS experience embodies şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř’s century-long commitment to making academic excellence accessible to students at all stages of life. Students in CPS programs engage with world-class şÚÁĎłÔąĎÍř faculty including scholars and practitioners, explore innovative educational technologies and experiences, and join an influential network of passionate alumni. In addition to its industry-leading programs at the nexus of theory and practice, CPS has built a reputation for its personal approach and supportive community that empowers adult students to enrich their lives, enhance their value in the workplace, and embark on new careers.
PURSUE THE NEXT YOU™ and visitĚýcps.villanova.eduĚýfor more information about the college, including a full list of education and program offerings.